Replicating and extending Martin-Quinn scores
Rok Spruk and
International Review of Law and Economics, 2019, vol. 60, issue C
We set to replicate and extend the commonly used Martin and Quinn (2002) scores of judicial ideology for the entire universe of U.S Supreme Court justices from 1793 onwards. Our replication strategy consists of three steps. First, we replicate the constant ideal point scores with a novel variable distinguishing between liberal and conservative case reversals. Using this variable, we show that the replicated scores exhibit a moderate-to-strong correlation with the original scores. Second, we extend the replication of constant ideal points to specific policy areas and show that the variation in latent judicial ideology in the areas of criminal procedure, economics, first amendment and due process strongly predict the overall scores. And third, we replicate and extend dynamic scores to capture the temporal changes in the judicial ideology using repeated sampling Monte Carlo Marko Chain simulation without imposing prior distribution on case-level parameters. To allow for judicial ideology to trend smoothly over time, we employ a large-scale MCMC simulation involving roughly 1.9 billion iterations of the baseline latent judicial trait model, and a filtering parameter to separate the long-run ideology trend from its cyclical component. The replicated dynamic ideal point estimates without prior restrictions generally confirm the trends of dynamic Martin-Quinn scores.
Keywords: Judicial ideology; Ideal points; Bayesian analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C11 C55 D72 K10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:60:y:2019:i:c:s0144818819302261
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. SchÃ¤fer
More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().