Making bad look good: The counterpersuasive effects of natural labels on (dangerous) vice goods

Cassandra Denise Davis and Scot Burton

Journal of Business Research, 2019, vol. 104, issue C, 271-282

Abstract: While Graphic Pictorial Health Warnings (GHWs) are assumed to be an effective counterargument against tobacco marketing, little is known about whether or when promotional messaging can serve as refutational appeals. Drawing from research on cognitive biases, this research posits that natural label claims attenuate the impact of GHWs by reducing risk perceptions, and the presence of these claims result in more favorable brand, product, and marketer evaluations. Two experimental studies show that, through perceived risk, natural label claims reduce the effectiveness of counterpersuasive GHWs on the outcomes of brand attitude, health misperceptions, purchase intentions, and marketer responsibility perceptions. Findings also confirm predictions that a relevant individual difference variable (quit attempt status) moderates the effects of the natural label claim on consumer evaluations. Results enhance our understanding of natural claims as a refutational appeal for vice products. Implications are offered for marketers, public policy makers, and public health advocates.

Keywords: Natural label claims; Graphic Pictorial Health Warnings; Vice goods; Tobacco advertising; Controversial industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304400
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:104:y:2019:i:c:p:271-282

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.023

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().