Design thinking for innovation: Composition, consequence, and contingency
Cheryl Nakata and
Journal of Business Research, 2020, vol. 118, issue C, 117-128
Design thinking, a design-based approach to solving human problems, is increasingly adopted by firms to develop innovations. However, what design thinking is, how it works, whether it leads to successful new products and services, and if such outcomes depend on market turbulence are unresolved issues. To address these knowledge gaps, we theorize a nomological network of design thinking’s composition, consequence, and contingency, and then examine the model through a survey of innovation managers. We conclude that design thinking consists of six inter-related mindsets and actions, strengthens new product and service performance, and has robust effects across levels of market turbulence. Based on one of the first confirmatory studies of design thinking, we draw implications of our findings for innovation theory and practice.
Keywords: Design thinking; Innovation; Mindsets and actions; New product and service performance; Market turbulence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:117-128
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside
More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().