 International cultural ambidexterity: Balancing tensions of foreign market entry into distant and proximate culturesOlga Bruyaka and Christiane Prange Journal of Business Research, 2020, vol. 118, issue C, 491-506 Abstract: Today’s internationalization challenges are no longer limited to dealing with cultural differences in bilateral interactions between a company’s headquarters and its subsidiary. Instead, companies need to simultaneously manage a portfolio of subsidiaries that can be culturally close or distant to each other. Existing literature has so far been slow at conceptualizing and measuring this phenomenon. Drawing on portfolio logic and an ambidexterity lens, we introduce the concept of international cultural ambidexterity (ICA) as a company’s dynamic capability to manage a portfolio of both culturally distant (exploration) and culturally proximate (exploitation) foreign markets. Developing ICA allows companies to benefit from cultural diversity and cultural distance and to better manage tensions arising from internationalization. We highlight differences between cultural distance, cultural diversity and ICA. Subsequently, we introduce a novel way of measuring ICA that extends studies on culture and ambidexterity in foreign market entry research. Keywords: Cultural distance; Cultural diversity; Exploration vs. exploitation; Ambidexterity; Portfolio; Vector graph methods (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:491-506 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.020 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.