 The role of ambiguity and skepticism in the effectiveness of sustainability labelingYoon-Na Cho and Charles R. Taylor Journal of Business Research, 2020, vol. 120, issue C, 379-388 Abstract: Given various “green” communication protocols offered in the marketplace, this paper adds insight on how consumers process sustainability labeling information with scale ratings. Drawing from ambiguity theory and numerosity literature, we conduct two experiments to examine the impact of brand-based sustainability levels and the range of scale magnitude on product evaluations. In general, we find that labels with scale ratings can be effective in influencing consumer attitudes toward the brand. However, the use of moderately high sustainability scores (as opposed to extremely high) and/or a larger scale range (e.g., 1-1,000) increases perceived ambiguity for consumers and reduces the persuasiveness of the information. We also find that the degree of sustainability skepticism moderates these relationships and that consumers who are skeptical toward labeling are more difficult to convince. We provide implications for researchers, managers, and policy makers. Keywords: Labeling; Green advertising; Sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:120:y:2020:i:c:p:379-388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.034 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.