EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

In eWOM we trust: Using naïve theories to understand consumer trust in a complex eWOM marketspace

Martin A. Pyle, Andrew N. Smith and Yanina Chevtchouk

Journal of Business Research, 2021, vol. 122, issue C, 145-158

Abstract: The relationship between trust and outcome-related responses to electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) is well-established in research. However, researchers’ consideration and measurement of trust are rooted in, and limited by, the field’s origins in studying offline, interpersonal word-of-mouth, a perspective that does not align with the reality of the eWOM marketspace. In this paper, we conceptualize, and offer evidence of, the eWOM marketspace as a multi-level, interconnected system shaped by multiple persuasion agents with overt and covert agendas. Analyzing data from 27 in-depth interviews, we explain how consumers develop networked, multi-dimensional assessments of trust and manage skepticism in this contemporary environment by drawing on naïve theories and learning from experience. We contribute to a more refined, fluid, and experientially-rooted understanding of consumer trust, and trust assessments in the eWOM marketspace, and offer practical implications for review platforms and marketers.

Keywords: Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM); Dimensional trust; Naïve theories; Persuasion knowledge (PKM); Online reviews; Review platforms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320305749
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:122:y:2021:i:c:p:145-158

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.063

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:122:y:2021:i:c:p:145-158