Preserving the legacy – Why do professional soccer clubs (not) adopt innovative process technologies? A grounded theory study
Ralf Plattfaut and
Julian Koch
Journal of Business Research, 2021, vol. 136, issue C, 237-250
Abstract:
Technologies such as Robotic Process Automation or Artificial Intelligence are becoming increasingly recognized as essential elements and engines of digital transformation in businesses today. However, especially in the professional sports industry, the adoption of these technologies appears to be lagging behind. This paper aims to provide a deeper perspective and understanding of the drivers and inhibitors of the adoption and use of innovative process technologies in professional sports. To this end, we conducted a grounded theory study of data collected from two German professional soccer clubs: one from the first league (Bundesliga) and one from the third league (3. Liga). Our study shows that adoption depends upon expected efficiency and effectiveness gains, perceived ease of use, perceived (positive) market pull, and perceived (negative) supporter perception. While the first three constructs are well-known in the technology acceptance literature, the latter two are comparably new in this research stream. Therefore, we discuss especially the impact of perceived positive market pull (i.e., a pull from clubs’ sponsors and competition) and perceived negative supporter perception (i.e., the fear that customers might lose loyalty due to increasing process digitalization) on the adoption and use of innovative process technologies in professional sports.
Keywords: Innovative process technologies; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive automation; Robotic process automation; Sports; Soccer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321005038
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:136:y:2021:i:c:p:237-250
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.024
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside
More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().