 Does gender affect qualifying decisions? Evidence from public sector auditsNieves Carrera and Mercedes Mareque Journal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 154, issue C Abstract: This study presents novel evidence of gender differencesinpublic sector audits. Auditors of public sector entities face lower litigation risks and lower market pressures than those ofprivate entities. Thus, our analysis is more likely to capture gender differences in professional competence than in economic incentives.We test the study hypotheses regarding gender differences in ‘qualifying’ audit reports using a sample of Spanish public universities (2010–2020). We find thatfemale and male auditors are equally likely to issue qualified opinions. However, their reasons for qualification differ, with womenbeing more likely to qualify reportsbecause of scope limitations. In joint audits, gender-diverse audit partners are more likely to increase scope limitations. These results suggest that women are more conservative than men are when assessing the impact of audit scope limitations, with no gender differences in responses to material misstatements. Keywords: Gender differences; Public sector audits; Female auditors; Audit opinions (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:154:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322008232 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113358 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.