 Is organizational ambidexterity always beneficial to family-managed SMEs? Evidence from ChinaMin Hu, Junsheng Dou and Xialei You Journal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 167, issue C Abstract: Organizational ambidexterity is considered an essential strategy for firms to achieve sustainable competitive advantages, but it is unreasonable to expect all firms to equally profit from pursuing organizational ambidexterity, as this is a resource-intensive strategy. Using the resource-based view, we proposed and tested two internal boundary conditions that shape the impact of organizational ambidexterity on firm performance: family management and formalization. The results of our three-way interaction analysis of data from 324 Chinese SMEs show that a higher level of family management weakens the positive impact of organizational ambidexterity on firm performance, and this negative moderating effect is further strengthened by the degree of a firm’s formalization. These findings help us better understand why resource-constrained firms are more likely to struggle when pursuing organizational ambidexterity. Keywords: Organizational ambidexterity; Family management; Formalization; Flexibility; Resource-based view (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s014829632300543x DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114184 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.