Innovation search after failure: The role of peers

Jiwei Xiong, Tao Wang and Haibin Yang

Journal of Business Research, 2024, vol. 183, issue C

Abstract: It is unclear how peers affect a firm’s choice of particular innovation direction in either exploration or exploitation after failure. To answer this question, we examine how the failures of peers with different relative sizes serve as key evidence of decision effectiveness beliefs to guide firms’ innovation search directions after innovation failure. We propose that smaller peers with less failure in exploration (or exploitation) are supportive evidence of a firm’s beliefs about the effectiveness of exploration (or exploitation), thereby increasing future exploration (or exploitation) after innovation failure. Conversely, larger peers with more failure in exploration (or exploitation) are non-supportive evidence of the belief in the effectiveness of exploration (or exploitation), thus reducing future exploration (or exploitation) after failure. Analyses of a unique database on the U.S. medical device industry from 1996 to 2018 support our theoretical framework.

Keywords: Behavioral Theory of the Firm; Problemistic Search; Innovation; Failure; Peers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324003771
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324003771

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114873

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().