The dynamics of consumer boycott intention: Examining the roles of moral reasoning, cognitive dissonance, and self-congruence

Eva Maria Jedicke, Christian Arnold and Jörg Lindenmeier

Journal of Business Research, 2025, vol. 189, issue C

Abstract: This study addresses consumer responses to unethical corporate behavior by examining the mediating effects of three moral reasoning strategies: moral rationalization, moral decoupling, and moral coupling. Specifically, this study evaluates how these moral reasoning strategies influence consumer behavior toward accused companies, focusing mainly on boycott intentions. This study also introduces cognitive dissonance as an additional mediating factor in the moral reasoning process. Recognizing the importance of self-congruence in brand–consumer relationships, this study proposes self-congruence as a moderator. Through these contributions, this study aims to advance the understanding of the antecedents and effects of moral reasoning processes on consumer responses to corporate misconduct.

Keywords: Boycott; Cognitive dissonance; Corporate misconduct; Moral reasoning; Self-congruence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006313
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:189:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324006313

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115127

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().