 Does ESG rating divergence exacerbate management tone manipulation? − Empirical evidence based on MD&A textWenjiao Wang, Ziyuan Sun and Lan Wang Journal of Business Research, 2025, vol. 197, issue C Abstract: ESG rating divergence has garnered significant attention, yet research often overlooks the management’s response strategies. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2015 to 2021, this study found that greater environmental, social, and governance (ESG) divergence is associated with more positive tones in the annual report’s Management Discussion and Analysis section. Thus, the management may engage in tone manipulation. Rating discrepancies increase operational risks and information asymmetry, prompting the management to adjust their tone. Applying fraud triangle theory, the study shows that tone manipulation is more likely under high public environmental concern, weak internal controls, and an inadequate legal environment. Additionally, ESG-sensitive firms, those based in Eastern China, those with high ESG ratings, and state-owned enterprises are more likely to adjust their tone in response to rating divergence. These findings underscore the strategic narrative adjustments that firms undertake when faced with inconsistent ESG ratings. Keywords: ESG rating divergence; Management tone; Text Analysis; Business risks; Information asymmetry (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002723 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115449 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.