The cost of contradiction: exploring consumer negative responses to activist brands’ moral transgressions

Riaj Mahmud and Francisco Guzmán

Journal of Business Research, 2025, vol. 200, issue C

Abstract: Brands are increasingly aligning themselves with social, environmental, and political causes, actively positioning themselves as activists. This research investigates consumer reactions to activist brands that fail to uphold their proclaimed moral ideals. It compares the negative effects of moral transgressions committed by activist brands versus non-activist brands and examines how perceived brand hypocrisy mediates this relationship. It also examines the differential consequences of moral transgressions related and unrelated to an activist brand’s activism focus. The findings of three studies suggest that activist brands face more intense negative responses than non-activist brands when committing identical transgressions, as evidenced by an increased likelihood of brand boycotts and the likelihood of negative word-of-mouth and, particularly, when the transgression directly contradicts the brand’s activism focus.

Keywords: Activist brands; Brand activism; Brand moral transgressions; Perceived brand hypocrisy; Experimental design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004588
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004588

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115635

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().