EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Success of mass customization toolkits: Product design typicality as boundary condition

Michael A. Zaggl, Marc Linzmajer, Gianfranco Walsh, Ronny Reinhardt and Judith Pottbäcker

Journal of Business Research, 2025, vol. 200, issue C

Abstract: Mass customization toolkits are often unsuccessful in inducing purchases of self-designed products. By adopting a user-centric view, the current study proposes that category involvement might function as an antecedent of purchase intentions, mediated by customers’ category–self-connection and moderated by perceived product design typicality. Leveraging attachment and categorization theory, we hypothesize that highly involved users already possess a strong sense of category–self-connection, which interferes with their purchase decisions if self-designed products appear typical of the product category rather than unique. Three studies test this theorizing. Study 1 (field study) demonstrates that category involvement increases actual purchase intentions. Study 2 (experiment) shows that the relationship between category involvement and purchase intentions is mediated by category–self-connection, as well as negatively moderated by perceived product design typicality. Study 3 (field study) corroborates the findings in another context (cars). The combined findings lead to theoretical and practical implications for user toolkits and their design.

Keywords: Co-creation; Mass customization; Perceived typicality; Category involvement; Self-connection; User toolkits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004928
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004928

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115669

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-30
Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004928