 20-F reconciliations and investment recommendations by financial professionalsGanesh Krishnamoorthy, James J. Maroney and Ciarán Ó hÓgartaigh Journal of Business Research, 2008, vol. 61, issue 4, 355-362 Abstract: As part of the U.S. regulatory requirements, non-U.S. companies registered on U.S. stock exchanges ('foreign registrants') are required to compile financial reports that comply with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ('GAAP') or provide a reconciliation of non-U.S. GAAP financial statements to U.S GAAP (20-F reconciliation). The objective of this study is to determine if identical information with respect to U.S. GAAP may be evaluated differently depending on whether the 20-F reconciliation information is presented in a positive (20-F reconciliation gain) or negative (20-F reconciliation loss) way. The research results indicate that the financial professionals' investment recommendations were significantly lower for a firm when it reports a reconciliation loss relative to when it reports a reconciliation gain or when it reports under U.S. GAAP, although the financial results were identical in all cases. Further, consistent with Bradshaw [Bradshaw MT. How do analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations? Account Rev 2004;79(1):25-50.], the financial professionals' expectations of earnings growth were significantly and positively associated with their investment recommendation. Date: 2008 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:61:y:2008:i:4:p:355-362 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.