Purging data before productivity analysis

Necmi K. Avkiran and Nakhun Thoraneenitiyan

Journal of Business Research, 2010, vol. 63, issue 3, 294-302

Abstract: Studies of productivity often ignore measurement error and fail to distinguish between exogenous and endogenous factors in adjusting for the environment. This failure may misguide managerial decisions on benchmarking, ranking, and remuneration. For example, common relative efficiency techniques such as data envelopment analysis (DEA) assume away the measurement error. This article combines DEA with stochastic frontier analysis in a synergistic multiple-stage analysis to purge the estimate of managerial performance of measurement error and exogenous factors. Removing the impact of measurement error indicates the largest rise in productivity. Removing the impact of exogenous factors raises discriminatory power. The method offers a number of innovations over other studies in the literature. The article is also the first to investigate the profit efficiency of the commercial banks in the United Arab Emirates.

Keywords: Productivity; Purging; data; Measurement; error; Environment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(09)00090-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:63:y:2010:i:3:p:294-302

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().