Simple versus complex selection rules for forecasting many time series

Robert Fildes and Fotios Petropoulos

Journal of Business Research, 2015, vol. 68, issue 8, 1692-1701

Abstract: Selecting the appropriate forecasting method for a large number of time series is a major problem for many organizational forecaster. Researchers propose various selection rules in order to enhance forecasting accuracy. The simpler approach for model selection involves the identification of a single method, which is applied to all data series in an aggregate manner, without taking into account the specific characteristics of a single series. On the other hand, individual selection includes the identification of the best method for each series, though it is more computationally intensive. A simple combination of methods also provides an operational benchmark. The current study explores the circumstances under which individual model selection is beneficial and when this approach should be preferred to aggregate selection or combination. The superiority of each approach is analyzed in terms of data characteristics, existence or not of a dominant method and stability of the competing methods' comparative performance. In addition, the size and composition of the pools of methods under consideration are examined. In order to assess the efficacy of individual model selection in the cases considered, simple selection rules are proposed, based on within-sample best fit or best forecasting performance for different forecast horizons. The analysis shows that individual selection works best when specific sub-populations of data are considered (e.g., trended or seasonal series), but also when the alternative methods' comparative performance is stable over time. A case study demonstrates the efficiency of the recommended selection strategy.

Keywords: Automatic model selection; Comparative methods; Extrapolative methods; Combination; Stability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315001423
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:68:y:2015:i:8:p:1692-1701

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.028

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().