Economics at your fingertips  

Entrepreneurs' propensity for corruption: A vignette-based factorial survey

Petra Dickel and Peter Graeff

Journal of Business Research, 2018, vol. 89, issue C, 77-86

Abstract: This paper investigates the ways in which cost-benefit considerations influence entrepreneurs' propensity to engage in corruption. It further investigates how the effects of these considerations are fostered by entrepreneurs' adherence to legal standards (norm internalization) and the degree to which they ponder the pros and cons of an ethically challenging business situation (deliberation). In order to deduce the causal effects and reduce social desirability bias, this study uses a vignette-based factorial survey. A multi-level analysis of 740 vignettes from 148 entrepreneurs indicates that the propensity of entrepreneurs to participate in acts of corruption is driven by expected economic gains and a high probability that the corruption will be successful. The impact of these factors increases when entrepreneurs have a higher tendency to ponder the pros and cons of an opportunity to commit corruption. However, the probability of detection does not affect their propensity for corruption.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship; Entrepreneurial ethics; Corruption; Factorial survey; Experimental design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2019-08-02
Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:89:y:2018:i:c:p:77-86