EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The dual-process model of similarity in cause-related marketing: How taxonomic versus thematic partnerships reduce skepticism and increase purchase willingness

Monica Mendini, Paula C. Peter and Michael Gibbert

Journal of Business Research, 2018, vol. 91, issue C, 195-204

Abstract: The “fit” between brand and cause has received considerable attention in the study of effective cause-related marketing. However, the literature is largely ambivalent in terms of what fit means, as little systematic research has looked into the relationship between cause and brand and its impact on consumers' skepticism, and in turn, on willingness to purchase. By drawing on the dual-process of similarity, four studies provide evidence on the role of thematic vs. taxonomic similarity in reducing skepticism and help companies understand which causes to support. Specifically, our results show that willingness to purchase the brand is higher in thematic partnerships and, counter intuitively, skepticism is higher in taxonomic partnerships. We discuss the results in light of the role of trust as mediator and regulatory focus as moderator of the effect. We offer theoretical and managerial implications of these results, discussed considering the demand for companies to be more socially responsible.

Keywords: Cause-related marketing; Fit; Skepticism; Trust; Regulatory focus; Willingness to purchase (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318302972
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:195-204

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.010

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside

More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:195-204