On the consequences of ignoring genetic influences in criminological research
Brian B. Boutwell,
Kevin M. Beaver,
Chris L. Gibson and
John P. Wright
Journal of Criminal Justice, 2014, vol. 42, issue 6, 471-482
Many criminological scholars explore the social causes of crime while giving little consideration to the possibility that genetic factors underlie the observed associations. Indeed, the standard social science method (SSSM) assumes genetic influences do not confound the association between X and Y. Yet, a nascent stream of evidence has questioned the validity of this approach by revealing many criminological variables are at least partially affected by genetic influences. As a result, a substantial proportion of the literature may be misspecified due to uncontrolled genetic factors. No effort has been made to directly estimate the extent to which genetic confounding has biased the associations presented in criminological studies.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:42:y:2014:i:6:p:471-482
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Criminal Justice is currently edited by Matthew DeLisi
More articles in Journal of Criminal Justice from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().