EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Prosecutors and crime deterrence: Evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis with staggered treatment

Samantha Bielen

Journal of Criminal Justice, 2024, vol. 90, issue C

Abstract: This paper exploits detailed offender-level data from the public prosecutor service to analyze whether a reform aimed at reducing recidivism was effective. The objective of this reform was to enhance deterrence by improving the certainty and celerity of punishment. More specifically, it (1) stimulated prosecutors to intensify the use of alternative dispositions (such as imposing settlements) in criminal cases that would otherwise have been dismissed, (2) reduced processing times by improving the collaboration between police and prosecutors, and (3) encouraged tailored decisions. Using a difference-in-differences approach, I exploit variation in when and where the district attorney reform was introduced to quantify its effect on recidivism rates. In doing so, I am able to compare otherwise similar individuals, who committed similar crimes, but who underwent different procedures. I further use an event study to assess the evolution of relative recidivism rates, and explore possible mechanisms including immediacy and certainty of punishment. The data reveal that after the reform, the prospects of recidivism linked to local crimes targeted by the reform decreased by 5 percentage points, a 26% reduction over the sample mean.

Keywords: Deterrence; Recidivism; Prosecutors; Reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235223001186
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0047235223001186

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102147

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Criminal Justice is currently edited by Matthew DeLisi

More articles in Journal of Criminal Justice from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0047235223001186