 Mental illness, race, gender and sentencing in state homicide casesTracy Sohoni and Sylwia J. Piatkowska Journal of Criminal Justice, 2025, vol. 97, issue C Abstract: This study explores the relationship between mental health and sentence length of homicide offenders in U.S. state courts, using a framework of focal concerns theory while incorporating an intersectional perspective. While legal and psychological scholars have argued that mental illness should serve as a mitigating factor in capital cases, it is also possible for mental illness to be viewed like an aggravating factor due to concerns about the individual's dangerousness. Given the high prevalence of mental illness among incarcerated individuals, any link between mental health and sentencing could affect a significant number of people. We employ negative binomial regression models across five waves of the Survey of Prison Inmates (SPI) to analyze this relationship. Our findings indicate that mental illness is related to differences in sentences for homicide defendants, with the impact varying by race, gender, and homicide type. Analyzing these results through the lens of focal concerns theory, we suggest that further research is warranted. Keywords: Sentencing; Mental health; Race; Gender; Homicide (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s004723522500025x DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102376 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Criminal Justice is currently edited by Matthew DeLisi More articles in Journal of Criminal Justice from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.