The subjective value of a life with Down syndrome: Evidence from amniocentesis decision

Thibault Gajdos (), Clémentine Garrouste and Pierre Geoffard

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2016, vol. 127, issue C, 59-69

Abstract: Using a simple theoretical decision model and an original database, we were able to elicit the distribution of the utility value of having a child with Down syndrome for a large sample of French pregnant women (n = 28,341) between 2003 and 2007. We found that, on a scale where the value of a fetal death is 0 and the value of a healthy child is 1, the mean value for a child with Down syndrome is about −0.6. Assuming that the policymaker used the same decision model as the women, we infer from the French amniocentesis reimbursement regulation an implicit social value for a child with Down syndrome of −2.5. We conclude from our study that the policymaker is more likely to prevent the birth of children with Down syndrome than French women themselves.

Keywords: Amniocentesis choices; Expected utility framework (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268116300543
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The subjective value of a life with Down syndrome: Evidence from amnocentesis decision (2021)
Working Paper: The subjective value of a life with Down syndrome: Evidence from amnocentesis decision (2021)
Working Paper: The subjective value of a life with Down syndrome: Evidence from amnocentesis decision (2021)
Working Paper: The subjective value of a life with Down syndrome: Evidence from amniocentesis decision (2016)
Working Paper: The subjective value of a life with Down syndrome: Evidence from amniocentesis decision (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:127:y:2016:i:c:p:59-69

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.04.014

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().