The compromise effect in action: Lessons from a restaurant's menu
Pia Pinger,
Isabel Ruhmer-Krell and
Heiner Schumacher
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2016, vol. 128, issue C, 14-34
Abstract:
The compromise effect refers to individuals’ tendency to choose intermediate options. Its existence has been demonstrated in a large number of hypothetical choice experiments. This paper uses field data from a specialties restaurant to investigate the existence and strength of the compromise effect in a natural environment. Despite the presence of many factors that potentially weaken the compromise effect (e.g., a very large choice set, the opportunity to choose familiar options), we find evidence for it both in descriptive statistics and regression analyses. Options which become a compromise after a change in the choice set gain on average five percent in market share.
Keywords: Utility theory; Restaurant data; Compromise effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 M31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268116300658
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: The Compromise Effect in Action: Lessons from a Restaurant's Menu (2016) 
Working Paper: The Compromise Effect in Action: Lessons from a Restaurant's Menu (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:128:y:2016:i:c:p:14-34
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.04.017
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().