Health insurance choice and risk preferences under cumulative prospect theory – an experiment
Markus Vomhof and
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2017, vol. 137, issue C, 374-397
We investigate how consumers choose insurance contracts when using a measure of decision quality based on individual risk preferences. For this, we use a laboratory experiment with a sequential design. First, subjects face insurance choices. Then, we elicit risk preferences. Allowing for different latent decision making theories, i.e. Cumulative Prospect Theory and Expected Utility Theory, we find that the vast majority are Cumulative Prospect Theory types. Analyzing whether subjects choose contracts consistent with their risk preferences, we find that about 14% of all participants show inconsistent behavior and low decision quality. Yet, the majority shows consistent behavior and good decision quality. Our results suggest that one explanation for inconsistent choices is the application of heuristics.
Keywords: Health insurance; Risk preferences; Heterogeneity; Laboratory experiment; Cumulative Prospect Theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 I13 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:137:y:2017:i:c:p:374-397
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Neilson, William Stuart
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().