Bankruptcy and cross-country differences in productivity
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2019, vol. 157, issue C, 359-381
For a sample of OECD countries, I document a systematic positive relationship between (i) aggregate productivity, (ii) the employment share by large firms and (iii) the proportion of large firms in the economy. I propose that differences in bankruptcy procedures can explain this relationship. In a model of financial intermediation and informational frictions, I show that as bankruptcy procedures worsen—measured by the amount a lender can recover from bankrupt borrowers—lenders respond by (i) shifting their portfolio of loans to smaller (less productive) firms and (ii) lending less. This finding is supported by empirical evidence: across countries, efficient bankruptcy procedures are associated with a higher proportion of new bank loans allocated to large firms. In the model, moving the level of recovery rate from the U.S. level to that of the lowest recovery rate country in the OECD sample reduces TFP by around 30 percent.
Keywords: Aggregate productivity; Bankruptcy; Financial frictions; Misallocation; Small firms; Employment shares (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E44 E23 E02 D24 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:157:y:2019:i:c:p:359-381
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().