Prospective gain-loss utility: Ordered versus separated comparison
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2019, vol. 168, issue C, 62-75
Koszegi and Rabin (2006, 2007) develop a model of expectations-based reference-dependent preferences in which the agent experiences “gain-loss utility” by comparing his actual consumption outcome to all of his previously expected consumption outcomes. Koszegi and Rabin (2009) then generalize the static model to a dynamic setting by assuming that the agent experiences both contemporaneous gain-loss utility over present consumption and “prospective” gain-loss utility by comparing his updated to his previous expectations about future consumption. Moreover, Koszegi and Rabin (2009) generalize the outcome-wise “static comparison” of gain-loss utility to a percentile-wise “ordered comparison,” in which the agent compares expected consumption outcomes at each percentile. This paper generalizes the static comparison slightly differently, to what I call a “separated comparison.” In the separated comparison, the agent compares each expected consumption outcome but experiences gain-loss utility only over uncertainty that has been realized, by effectively separating it from remaining future uncertainty. This paper shows that the separated comparison yields simple, tractable, and well-behaved equilibria in a broad class of economic models. Moreover, the equilibria are easy to solve for because the separated comparison preserves an outcome-wise linear structure.
Keywords: Expectations-based reference dependence; Prospective gain-loss utility; Endogenous and stochastic reference points (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 D11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:168:y:2019:i:c:p:62-75
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().