EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Intertemporal discrete choice

Daniele Pennesi ()

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2021, vol. 186, issue C, 690-706

Abstract: Random utility models are widely used to estimate preference parameters. In the case of intertemporal choice, the two most common models are the discounted logit and one we call the discounted Luce. Due to their apparent similarity, the choice to use one model or the other seems irrelevant. In this paper, we argue that the discounted Luce is superior to the discounted logit in two significant aspects. First, in relevant applications, the discounted Luce is monotone in the sense of Apesteguia and Ballester (2018), while the discounted logit is not. Second, we show that the discounted logit is incompatible with a property of choice probabilities we call “weak stationarity”. The latter is compatible with common assumptions on the random nature of choices and is often not falsifiable with commonly available data. Fitting a logit model to weakly stationary choice probabilities biases the time-preference estimates. On the contrary, the discounted Luce can be safely used when choice probabilities are weakly stationary. An application to an existing dataset supports the theoretical results.

Keywords: Random Choice; Intertemporal Choice; Logit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 D9 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268120304066
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Intertemporal discrete choice (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:690-706

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.005

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2024-02-12
Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:690-706