Inequality and the Ability to Aspire

Jeffrey Allen and Shankha Chakraborty

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2022, vol. 203, issue C, 264-283

Abstract: Households with ex ante identical preference and ability but heterogeneous wealth decide whether or not to aspire to a common benchmark. The choice depends on the tradeoff between higher utility from wealth accumulation and lower utility from falling short. People choose to be aspirational if they are wealthy enough. This creates a tendency for polarization of aspirations and wealth. Demographic change counteracts it. As the relationship between fertility and household income goes from positive to negative, the non-aspirational poor procreate at a faster rate which, through the aspirational benchmark, brings aspirations within their reach. Not everyone aspires in the long run and wealth and lifetime utility gaps persist if the response to aspirations is strong.

JEL-codes: D31 J1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268122003109
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:203:y:2022:i:c:p:264-283

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.031

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().