Focusing as commitment

Matthew Nagler

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2023, vol. 216, issue C, 520-534

Abstract: I analyze the decisions of a β−δ consumer who, through effort invested in focusing on the future, sets the δ that will apply to her self in the next period. She has access to no other commitment technology. Because the model interprets dynamic inconsistency in a way that gives rise to the demand for costly self-control, it disambiguates the welfare benefit of commitment devices that limit future options. It explains why cognitive loading is associated with impulsivity, why U.S. savings rates have exhibited increased income stratification since the 1980s, and what visionary leadership and role models signify in economic terms.

Keywords: Self-control; Preference for commitment; Time inconsistency; Personal savings rate; Cognitive bandwidth; Visionary leadership; Episodic future thinking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D11 D15 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268123003931
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:216:y:2023:i:c:p:520-534

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.10.033

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().