Travelers' types

Pablo Brañas-Garza, Maria Paz Espinosa and Pedro Rey-Biel

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2011, vol. 78, issue 1-2, 25-36

Abstract: This paper uses subjects' diverse self-reported justifications to explain discrepancies between observed heterogeneous behavior and the unique equilibrium prediction in a one-shot traveler's dilemma experiment. Principal components analysis suggests that iterative reasoning, aspiration levels, competitive behavior, attitudes towards risk and penalties and focal points may be behind different choices. Such reasons are coherent with same subjects' behavior in other tests and experiments in which these particular issues are prominent, and thus, we identify "types" of subjects. Overall, we conclude that subjects' self-justifications in complex strategic situations contain informational value which may be used to predict behavior in other situations of economic importance.

Keywords: Traveler's; dilemma; Self-reports; Principal; components; Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-2681(11)00004-7
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Journal Article: Travelers’ types (2011)
Working Paper: Travelers' Types (2011)
Working Paper: Travelers' Types
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:78:y:2011:i:1-2:p:25-36

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().