Are regulatory management evaluations informative about bank accounting returns and risk?

Lewis Gaul and Ajay Palvia

Journal of Economics and Business, 2013, vol. 66, issue C, 21 pages

Abstract: This paper considers the association between regulatory management evaluations and bank accounting returns and risk. For robustness, we estimate our tests using a matched sample with equal numbers of banks with and without weak regulatory management evaluations. We document a strong association between weak ex-ante regulatory assessments of management and poor accounting returns not explained by other financial or regulatory indicators. We do not find robust evidence that weak management evaluations are linked with risk. Our results suggest that regulatory assessments of bank management are informative and that better managed banks perform better without necessarily taking on greater risk.

Keywords: Bank supervision, Corporate governance, Financial institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G28 G30 G31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619512000690
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:66:y:2013:i:c:p:1-21

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2012.11.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economics and Business is currently edited by Emanuele Bajo and Moritz Ritter

More articles in Journal of Economics and Business from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().