Comparison of generic advertising for a competitive industry to a monopolist

Richard Just and Rulon D. Pope

Journal of Economics and Business, 2016, vol. 85, issue C, 73-83

Abstract: This paper compares competitive output and generic (or check-off) advertising of the type commonly facilitated in agriculture to the levels of output and advertising under monopoly with the same industry cost structure and consumer preferences using the complementary preference approach developed by Becker and Murphy and others. Advertising is assumed to be seller-determined in the case of monopoly or by an industry advertising planner in the case of competition. The marginal benefit function of advertising in the case of competition is much different than for a monopolist with the same industry cost structure. Although of similar mathematical form in equilibrium, the resulting behavior and intuition are different, and neither achieves a social optimum. Conditions under which monopoly output and advertising are greater than under competition with generic advertising are derived.

Keywords: Generic advertising; Competitive industries; Monopoly (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619516000023
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:85:y:2016:i:c:p:73-83

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2016.01.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economics and Business is currently edited by Emanuele Bajo and Moritz Ritter

More articles in Journal of Economics and Business from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().