Updating allowance allocations in cap-and-trade: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program
Ian Lange and
Peter Maniloff
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2021, vol. 105, issue C
Abstract:
The level and distribution of the costs of tradable allowance schemes are important determinants of whether the regulation is enacted. Theoretical and simulation models have shown that updating allowance allocations based on firm emissions or output can improve the efficiency of the scheme by acting as a production subsidy. Using the U.S. NOx Budget Program as a case study, this analysis tests whether electricity generators in states which chose an updating allocation increase their electricity production relative to plants in states that chose a fixed allocation. Econometric results provide evidence that updating allocations lead to an increase in generation for natural gas combined cycle generators, but not for coal generators. This effect is concentrated in low-demand overnight hours and varies both by the local mixture of coal and NGCC generators and by percentile. These findings imply that an updating allocation confers a modest but meaningful subsidy to production relative to a fixed allocation and that firm responses are heterogeneous based on production technology and market conditions.
Keywords: Cap-and-trade; Contingent allocation; Updating allocation; NOx budget program (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069620301030
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Updating Allowance Allocations in Cap-and-Trade: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program (2017) 
Working Paper: Updating Allowance Allocations in Cap-and-Trade: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0095069620301030
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102380
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management is currently edited by M.A. Cole, A. Lange, D.J. Phaneuf, D. Popp, M.J. Roberts, M.D. Smith, C. Timmins, Q. Weninger and A.J. Yates
More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().