The market for ethical goods

Nicolas Bonneton

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2025, vol. 133, issue C

Abstract: This paper studies how consumers and producers sort themselves in markets for ethically labeled goods, such as “organic” or “child-labor-free,” considering both extrinsic and intrinsic motives. I show how greenwashing arises from the interplay between prosocial motives and equilibrium sorting. A positive demand shock leads more producers to adopt the label, including some with weaker ethical motives. This lowers the expected environmental and social quality of labeled, but also unlabeled goods. The optimal subsidy for producing ethically labeled goods is smaller than the Pigouvian subsidy, and in some cases, it may even be optimal to tax these goods.

Keywords: Ethical labels; Intrinsic motivation; Organic; Greenwashing; Environmental subsidies; Adverse selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009506962500066X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s009506962500066x

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103182

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management is currently edited by M.A. Cole, A. Lange, D.J. Phaneuf, D. Popp, M.J. Roberts, M.D. Smith, C. Timmins, Q. Weninger and A.J. Yates

More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().