Negotiating a voluntary agreement when firms self-regulate
Pierre Fleckinger and
Matthieu Glachant
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2011, vol. 62, issue 1, 41-52
Abstract:
Does self-regulation improve social welfare? We develop a policy game featuring a regulator and a firm that can unilaterally commit to better environmental or social behavior in order to preempt future public policy efforts. We show that the answer depends on the set of policy instruments available to the regulator. Self-regulation improves welfare if the regulator can only use mandatory regulation, but it reduces welfare when the regulator opts for a voluntary agreement. This suggests that self-regulation and voluntary agreements are not good complements from a welfare point of view. We derive policy implications, and extend the basic model in several dimensions.
Keywords: Self-regulation; Negotiation; Regulation; preemption; Voluntary; agreement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069611000295
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Negotiating a Voluntary Agreement When Firms Self-Regulate (2011) 
Working Paper: Negotiating a Voluntary Agreement When Firms Self-Regulate (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:62:y:2011:i:1:p:41-52
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management is currently edited by M.A. Cole, A. Lange, D.J. Phaneuf, D. Popp, M.J. Roberts, M.D. Smith, C. Timmins, Q. Weninger and A.J. Yates
More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().