Motivating emissions cleanup: Absolute vs. relative performance standards
Jamie T. Mullins
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2018, vol. 91, issue C, 66-92
This article empirically compares the effectiveness of relative versus absolute performance standards in motivating compliance actions. By leveraging a unique set of Chilean administrative panel data, I examine a natural experiment created by a change in the performance standard used to incentivize the reduction of particulate matter in the atmospheric emissions of stationary pollution sources in the Santiago Metropolitan Region. I find that the absolute standard drove ∼21% less emissions cleanup than did the relative standard. I also demonstrate how sharp heterogeneity in responses to the change in standards is predictable based on an ex-ante identifiable type-categorization, which leads to the broadly-applicable conclusion that stricter regimes drive more compliance actions when imposed via an absolute performance standard compared to a relative standard. The extension of this framework provides a general means of anticipating whether an absolute or relative performance standard will drive higher rates of compliance actions in other settings.
Keywords: Absolute standard; Relative standard; Air pollution; Air quality policy; Regulatory uncertainty; Environmental regulation; Chile; Criterion-referenced standard; Norm-referenced standard (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D47 D81 H41 Q52 Q53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:66-92
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management is currently edited by M.A. Cole, A. Lange, D.J. Phaneuf, D. Popp, M.J. Roberts, M.D. Smith, C. Timmins, Q. Weninger and A.J. Yates
More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().