 Maximizing the impact of climate finance: Funding projects or pilot projects?Matthew Kotchen and Christopher Costello Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2018, vol. 92, issue C, 270-281 Abstract: When and how should public agencies provide finance to the private sector in support of climate change mitigation and adaptation? We distinguish theoretically between pilot projects, whose main objective is to obtain information about the desirability of a climate-related project, and full projects, which are at-scale and are often quite risky. When a successful project has distinct private and public benefits, a publicly-funded subsidy may be warranted to induce a pilot project, a full project, or both. We draw on insights about the value of experimentation for entrepreneurship and raising private capital to derive insights about when subsidizing projects or pilots is more efficient. We find that pilot projects have many virtues not previously examined, and these often render them the optimal target of public subsidies to the private sector. JEL-codes: G38 H4 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:270-281 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.009 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Environmental Economics and Management is currently edited by M.A. Cole, A. Lange, D.J. Phaneuf, D. Popp, M.J. Roberts, M.D. Smith, C. Timmins, Q. Weninger and A.J. Yates More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.