Strategic implications of counter-geoengineering: Clash or cooperation?

Daniel Heyen, Joshua Horton and Juan Moreno-Cruz

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2019, vol. 95, issue C, 153-177

Abstract: Solar geoengineering has received increasing attention as an option to temporarily stabilize global temperatures. A key concern is that heterogeneous preferences over the optimal amount of cooling combined with low deployment costs may allow the country with the strongest incentive for cooling, the so-called free-driver, to impose a substantial externality on the rest of the world. We analyze whether the threat of counter-geoengineering technologies capable of negating the climatic effects of solar geoengineering can overcome the free-driver problem and tilt the game in favour of international cooperation. Our game-theoretical model of countries with asymmetric preferences allows for a rigorous analysis of the strategic interaction surrounding solar geoengineering and counter-geoengineering. We find that counter-geoengineering prevents the free-driver outcome, but not always with benign effects. The presence of counter-geoengineering leads to either a climate clash where countries engage in a non-cooperative escalation of opposing climate interventions (negative welfare effect), a moratorium treaty where countries commit to abstain from either type of climate intervention (indeterminate welfare effect), or cooperative deployment of solar geoengineering (positive welfare effect). We show that the outcome depends crucially on the degree of asymmetry in temperature preferences between countries.

Keywords: Climate intervention; Solar geoengineering; Counter-geoengineering; Free-driver; Strategic conflicts; Game theory; Cooperation; Externality; Global warming; International environmental agreements (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D02 D62 D74 H41 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069618305035
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Strategic implications of counter-geoengineering: clash or cooperation? (2019)
Working Paper: Strategic Implications of Counter-Geoengineering: Clash or Cooperation? (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:95:y:2019:i:c:p:153-177

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.005

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management is currently edited by M.A. Cole, A. Lange, D.J. Phaneuf, D. Popp, M.J. Roberts, M.D. Smith, C. Timmins, Q. Weninger and A.J. Yates

More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().