The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation

Franz Dietrich and Philippe Mongin

Journal of Economic Theory, 2010, vol. 145, issue 2, 562-582

Abstract: In the framework of judgment aggregation, we assume that some formulas of the agenda are singled out as premisses, and that both Independence (formula-wise aggregation) and Unanimity Preservation hold for them. Whether premiss-based aggregation thus defined is compatible with conclusion-based aggregation, as defined by Unanimity Preservation on the non-premisses, depends on how the premisses are logically connected, both among themselves and with other formulas. We state necessary and sufficient conditions under which the combination of both approaches leads to dictatorship (resp. oligarchy), either just on the premisses or on the whole agenda. Our analysis is inspired by the doctrinal paradox of legal theory and is arguably relevant to this field as well as political science and political economy. When the set of premisses coincides with the whole agenda, a limiting case of our assumptions, we obtain several existing results in judgment aggregation theory.

Keywords: Doctrinal; paradox; Premiss-based; and; conclusion-based; approach; Judgment; aggregation; Impossibility; theorems; Majority; voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022-0531(10)00022-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation (2010)
Working Paper: The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation (2010)
Working Paper: The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:145:y:2010:i:2:p:562-582

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().