The (In)validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem–findings from a representative German population survey
Bernd Hayo () and
Florian Neumeier ()
Journal of Macroeconomics, 2017, vol. 51, issue C, 162-174
In this paper, we utilize data from a German population survey to test the validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem (RET). In 2013, 2,000 representatively chosen people were asked whether they have altered their consumption and saving behavior in response to the significant increase in public debt that occurred between 2008 and 2012. Our findings reveal notable deviations from RET. However, we cannot rule out that the majority of Germans behave ‘partly’ in a Ricardian manner. This could either indicate a large fraction of rule-of-thumb or impatient consumers in the economy, or a widely prevalent mix of partially Ricardian and partially non-Ricardian behavior. Moreover, using multinomial logit regressions, we find that individuals’ consumption responses are significantly related to their economic situation, time preferences, education, and age.
Keywords: Ricardian equivalence; Public debt; Private consumption; Private saving; Survey; Germany (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D91 E21 H31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: The (In)validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem-findings from a representative German population survey (2017)
Working Paper: The (In)Validity of the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem – Findings from a Representative German Population Survey (2016)
Working Paper: The (In)Validity of the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem—Findings from a Representative German Population Survey (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:162-174
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Macroeconomics is currently edited by Douglas McMillin and Theodore Palivos
More articles in Journal of Macroeconomics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().