EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior

Shaul Shalvi, Jason Dana, Michel J.J. Handgraaf and Carsten K.W. De Dreu

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, vol. 115, issue 2, 181-190

Abstract: Employing a die-under-cup paradigm, we study the extent to which people lie when it is transparently clear they cannot be caught. We asked participants to report the outcome of a private die roll and gain money according to their reports. Results suggest that the degree of lying depends on the extent to which self-justifications are available. Specifically, when people are allowed to roll the die three times to ensure its legitimacy, but only the first roll is supposed to "count," we find evidence that the highest outcome of the three rolls is reported. Eliminating the ability to observe more than one roll reduces lying. Additional results suggest that observing desired counterfactuals, in the form of additional rolls not meant to determine pay, attenuates the degree to which people perceive lies as unethical. People seem to derive value from self-justifications allowing them to lie for money while feeling honest.

Keywords: Lies; Deception; Ethical; decision; making; Behavioral; economics; Behavioral; ethics; Morality; Ethics; Counterfactual; thinking; Norm; Theory; Mutability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (197)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597811000240
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:115:y:2011:i:2:p:181-190

Access Statistics for this article

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is currently edited by John M. Schaubroeck

More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:115:y:2011:i:2:p:181-190