Interactions between motivation to fake and personality item characteristics: Clarifying the process
Neil M.A. Hauenstein,
Kevin M. Bradley,
O’Shea, Patrick Gavan,
Yashna J. Shah and
Douglas P. Magill
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2017, vol. 138, issue C, 74-92
Abstract:
Using a think aloud protocol, the interaction between motivation to fake and personality item characteristics (social desirability and face validity) on both response processes and self-ratings were studied under three instructional sets. The first study compared respond honestly to a fake-good instructional set, and results indicated that motivation to fake and item characteristics have interactive effects on both response processes and self-ratings. The second study replicated the first study using an applicant instructional set and results indicated that applicant response processes and self-ratings were more similar to the respond honestly instructional set than fake-good instructional set from study 1. However, there were meaningful differences between the applicant and respond honestly instructional sets. Results were discussed in relation to process models of faking, importance of considering item characteristics in all faking research, and practical implications related to the predictive accuracy of personality scales and detection of faking.
Keywords: Personality; Faking; Verbal-protocol; Think-aloud; Social-desirability; Face validity; Item characteristics; Personnel selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597816307324
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:74-92
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.002
Access Statistics for this article
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is currently edited by John M. Schaubroeck
More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().