EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Thinking beyond boundaries: A growth theory of interest enhances integrative thinking that bridges the arts and sciences

Paul A. O'Keefe, E.J. Horberg, Anandita Sabherwal, Gabrielle C. Ibasco and Adlin Binti Zainal

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2021, vol. 162, issue C, 95-108

Abstract: Innovations often arise when people bridge seemingly disparate areas of knowledge, such as the arts and sciences. What leads people to make connections that others might miss? We examined the role of implicit theories of interest—the belief that interests are relatively fixed (a fixed theory of interest) or developed (a growth theory of interest) among people with established interests either in the area of arts or sciences. A stronger growth theory predicted that participants spontaneously noticed more stimuli from the area outside their interests (Studies 2 and 3) and generated better integrative ideas (Study 1). Furthermore, they were more likely to generate ideas that bridged the arts and sciences (Study 2), which was also found after inducing fixed or growth theories, establishing causality (Study 3). Finally,perceived utility of the outside area mediated this relation (Study 4). These results suggest that a growth theory may be important for integrative thinking and innovation across traditional disciplinary boundaries.

Keywords: Attention; Implicit theories; Innovation; Integrative thinking; Interest; Mindsets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597820303939
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:162:y:2021:i:c:p:95-108

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.007

Access Statistics for this article

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is currently edited by John M. Schaubroeck

More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:162:y:2021:i:c:p:95-108