Different ally motivations lead to different outcomes: How self-transcendence and self-enhancement values predict effectiveness of self-identified allies

L. Taylor Phillips, Tamar A. Kreps and Dolly Chugh

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2024, vol. 182, issue C

Abstract: Dominant group members have different reasons for identifying themselves as allies to marginalized groups. How might these reasons relate to allies’ effectiveness? We use Schwartz’s values theory to integrate disparate work, focusing on two values that can underlie allyship: self-transcendence, or enhancing the welfare of others, and self-enhancement, or personal status and esteem. Across three yoked experiments (N = 3016), we tested how values relate to allies’ intentions, behavior, and persuasiveness. Phase A of each study sampled self-identified allies (e.g., towards LGBTQ+ people, Black people, women). Both self-transcendence and, less consistently, self-enhancement predicted increased activism intentions; only self-transcendence predicted petition-signing behavior. Phase B sampled new participants, who viewed advocacy statements generated by allies in Phase A. We found that ally values affected audience reactions: ally self-transcendence was associated with greater persuasiveness, while self-enhancement was associated with lower persuasiveness. Although both values can generate ally engagement, self-transcendence may promote greater ally effectiveness.

Keywords: Allies/allyship; Schwartz values; Inequity/inequality; Privilege; Collective action (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597824000256
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000256

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104333

Access Statistics for this article

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is currently edited by John M. Schaubroeck

More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().