The detachment paradox: Employers recognize the benefits of detachment for employee well-being and performance, yet penalize it in employee evaluations

Eva C. Buechel and Elisa Solinas

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2025, vol. 188, issue C

Abstract: The present research establishes what we call the “detachment paradox.” Managers recognize that psychological detachment from work during non-work hours benefits workers’ well-being and, critically, enhances their performance during working hours. Yet, these same managers penalize employees who are perceived to detach when evaluating their promotability. Using a variety of methodologies across 16 studies, we test the existence and the boundaries of this paradox. The detachment paradox is observed among various samples ranging from experienced managers to lay individuals, for commonly used detachment strategies (e.g., out-of-office emails, requesting vacation days), for hypothetical workers as well as for managers’ own workers, and even when detachment strategies are used for virtuous reasons (e.g., taking care of a sick relative). In addition, these studies establish that inferences about commitment to work drive the associated detachment penalty. Accordingly, workers are penalized less if detachment strategies are used for reasons that indicate a commitment to work. Lastly, we provide initial evidence that implementing formalized detachment policies (e.g., no emails over weekends) may reduce the detachment penalty and call for future research on this important topic.

Keywords: Work–life balance; Psychological detachment; Employee well-being; Employee performance; Employee commitment; Employee evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597825000159
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:188:y:2025:i:c:s0749597825000159

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104403

Access Statistics for this article

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is currently edited by John M. Schaubroeck

More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().