 Medical progress and life cycle choicesThe Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 2022, vol. 23, issue C Abstract: In this paper, I show how medical progress, conceptualized as increasing effectiveness of health spending in reducing health deficits, affects optimal lifetime health behavior and health outcomes. To that end, I set up a stochastic life cycle model with endogenous health and longevity, calibrate it for an average American in the year 2010, and use counterfactual computational experiments to examine behavior and outcomes at lower and higher levels of medical efficacy. I begin with the standard health deficit model and the consideration of optimal health expenditure and savings. I then extend the model towards choices of occupation, unhealthy consumption, and retirement. When medical effectiveness increases by 50 percent, the benchmark American is predicted to display 23 percent fewer health deficits at age 65, retire more than 10 years later, live more than 7 years longer, and experience a 10 percent increase in the value of life at age 65. Richer and better educated individuals are predicted to benefit more from medical progress in terms of reduced morbidity and increased longevity. Keywords: Medical progress; Health behavior; Health deficits; Longevity; Life cycle model (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joecag:v:23:y:2022:i:c:s2212828x22000470 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100415 Access Statistics for this article The Journal of the Economics of Ageing is currently edited by D.E. Bloom, A. Sousa-Poza and U. Sunde More articles in The Journal of the Economics of Ageing from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.