EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Should China introduce a social pension?

Bei Lu, Wenjiong He and John Piggott

The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 2014, vol. 4, issue C, 76-87

Abstract: In spite of recent policy innovations, more than half China’s population have little cash benefit entitlement in later life. This paper calculates the revenue costs of a universal social pension scheme for China, using the poverty line as the standard for pension benefit. We provide new estimates of longevity into the future using the Lee-Carter approach. Alternative benefit scenarios are used to assess the burden of the plan on younger generations. Our central case estimates lie in the range of 0.7–1% of GDP annually, over a 40year horizon, set at the current poverty line of about 6.6% of GDP per capita, with retirement age increased to 65, and assuming that those with formal pension entitlement are excluded. With more generous benefits, lower retirement age, and lower than expected fertility, however, costs can be as high as 4.5% of GDP.

Keywords: Soical pension; China; Aging; Demographic; Revenue cost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X13000200

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joecag:v:4:y:2014:i:c:p:76-87

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2013.12.001

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of the Economics of Ageing is currently edited by D.E. Bloom, A. Sousa-Poza and U. Sunde

More articles in The Journal of the Economics of Ageing from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:joecag:v:4:y:2014:i:c:p:76-87