Using the Evaluative Space Grid to better capture manifest ambivalence in customer satisfaction surveys
Alice Audrezet and
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018, vol. 43, issue C, 285-295
Considering that midpoints on linear scales wrongly aggregates indifferent, uncertain and ambivalent responses, this research investigates the ability of the Evaluative Space Grid (ESG) to disentangle uncertainty from manifest ambivalence. Uncovering situations in which respondents hold simultaneous and conflicting but certain evaluations, manifest ambivalence reveals of utmost significance for market researchers. Using a mixed approach, both qualitative and quantitative, this research confirms that the ESG isolates manifest ambivalence in its upper-right zone, and provides implications for practitioners involved in service quality and consumer satisfaction measurement.
Keywords: Customer satisfaction; Ambivalence; Evaluative Space Grid; Measurement tool (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joreco:v:43:y:2018:i:c:p:285-295
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is currently edited by Harry Timmermans
More articles in Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().