Illegitimate returns as a trigger for customersâ€™ ethical dissonance
Chen-Ya Wang and
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018, vol. 45, issue C, 120-131
This study investigates the combined impact of customer merchandise return circumstances (legitimate or illegitimate) and service employee responses on customer outcomes (loyalty and ingratiation), through the lens of the ethical dissonance framework. Respondents (Nâ€¯=â€¯916) were randomly divided among six experimental conditions in a 2â€¯Ã—â€¯3 between-subjects design. As predicted, returns circumstances moderated the relationship between employee responses and customer outcomes: Despite employeesâ€™ angry response to delinquent customers, the latter's levels of loyalty toward the business as well as ingratiation toward the service employees were less damaged than in the case of normative customers exposed to the same employee angry response. This, we suggest, reflects an intention to quiet the dissonance on the part of the customers upon realizing that their delinquent behavior was evident to the service employee.
Keywords: Ethical dissonance; Customer-related outcomes; Customer loyalty; Customer ingratiation; Fraudulent return; Employeesâ€™ responses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joreco:v:45:y:2018:i:c:p:120-131
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is currently edited by Harry Timmermans
More articles in Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().